1987 Dodge Dakota High Voltage Showing on Volt Meter

Tiny
CAROL SCHMITZ
  • MEMBER
  • 1987 DODGE DAKOTA
Electrical problem
1987 Dodge Dakota 6 cyl Two Wheel Drive Automatic

My son took off the alternator to rebuild it. He then put it back on, but put the wires on incorrectly and something started smoking. He then put the wires on correctly. Next, he bought a voltage regulator at a parts store and put that in. Now the multi meter is reading 18 volts output. What could possibly be wrong?

Is it a problem with the wires needing to be replaced? Is it a problem with a fusible link?

He just had the alternator tested at a parts store and it tested fine. It does have one bushing on the back that is kind of wobbly, but it was tested at the auto parts store with those original bushings in place.

I'm guessing that this will not be answered any time soon after noticing that you REALLY WANT TO BE PAID TO HELP PEOPLE, so this is pretty much a BIG waste of my time. Botta get vehicle working to get to the job to stay alive. No time to screw around.
Sunday, April 26th, 2009 AT 7:58 AM

2 Replies

Tiny
CARADIODOC
  • MECHANIC
  • 33,871 POSTS
Something is causing the alternator to be "full-fielded". Left alone, this will ruin the battery. Do you know where the smoke was coming from? Just to be safe, measure the voltage right across the battery terminals while the engine is running. If it is indeed 18 volts, the system is over-charging. In this case, no fuse link is burned open. If you find 12 volts or less, or the battery goes dead while driving, measure the voltage on the large terminal on the back of the alternator while it's running. If this is the one with the loose bushing you referred to, the wire must be removed, and the nut under it tightened to prevent intermittent operation. Disconnect the battery before removing this wire. If you find 18 volts there, the output current isn't making it back to the battery. Suspect an open fuse link. This would happen if the heavy wire on the alternator was mistakenly grounded. The dash gauge is connected to the alternator side of the fuse link, and since the voltage regulator in the engine computer sees the lower battery voltage, it commands the alternator to work harder and harder in an attempt to get the battery voltage up to 13.75 to 14.75 volts.

Another way to test for an open fuse link is to measure the voltage on the large alternator terminal with the engine NOT running. Full battery voltage must be on that terminal at all times. If it's missing, a fuse link is burned open. I seem to recall it is a wire very near the positive battery terminal, possibly in a large two-wire connector.

If the battery voltage is too high, (over 14.75 volts), one of the small alternator wires is grounded or the voltage regulator is defective. Finding this problem involves measuring the voltages on the two small terminals on the alternator. One will be battery voltage; the other one will less, but it should not be zero. The lower the voltage on the second wire, the bigger electromagnetic field is being produced, and the higher the voltage, (and resultant current), is being requested by the voltage regulator. Chrysler voltage regulators very rarely develop problems, even when something was connected incorrectly.

The two small terminals are usually in a plastic block so they can't be mixed up. Even if they are separate individual wires, as on older cars and trucks, they can be installed either way. Switching those two wires will have no affect on alternator operation.

If you don't find the problem, send a reply with the voltage readings on the three alternator terminals with the engine running and with the ignition switch off.

I don't get compensated for answering questions. I share my expertise because I like older Chrysler products from the days before every imaginable item on the vehicles became computer-controlled, and I want you to like your product too. My daily driver is an unbelievably reliable 1988 Grand Caravan with only the one engine computer. My two newer cars just sit here unused, and I will likely never buy another new car because of all the unnecessary, unreliable, complicated computers.

Caradiodoc
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
+1
Monday, April 27th, 2009 AT 4:44 AM
Tiny
CAROL SCHMITZ
  • MEMBER
  • 2 POSTS
Thanks for the reply. My faith in humanity has been restored. I am checking this email today, May 17, 2009. I just never thought I would hear from anyone, so I am really glad to get your reply.

Unfortunately, had I looked at this sooner, we could have come to some conclusion with the Dakota. We wound up buying a new alternator which solved the problem. My son is the owner of the Dakota, and he is completely of the same opinion on new cars as you are. He loves the older, less complicated vehicles. I don't think I will ever see him purchase a newer vehicle. He's 29 years old and buys nothing but 1980's vehicles. Some of them are in questionable shape, but their engines are sound, and they are a lot more fun to do repairs on.

Thanks again for sharing this information. I am printing it off should this problem occur again. It will come in handy I'm sure.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
Sunday, May 17th, 2009 AT 10:37 AM

Please login or register to post a reply.

Sponsored links