Discussing two different vehicles is confusing. If the Voyager has the A604 4-speed transmission, I doubt you'll find a shift kit for it. The operating characteristics are part of the programming in the computer. It knows the volume of fluid it takes to apply each clutch pack, and it continually updates the shift schedules and clutch-apply overlap to maintain a smooth solid shift as those plates wear down. There is no accumulator to soften the clutch application like we had in the hydraulically-controlled 904 and 727. The shift feel is controlled by pulsing the appropriate solenoids rapidly on and off to control and slow down fluid flow. That's the ratcheting noise you hear when you shift out of park.
If you have the 3-speed hydraulically-controlled transmission, those are so tough already that there's nothing you're going to do to extend its life. I have one in my '88 Grand Caravan daily driver, and I regularly pull an enclosed tandem axle trailer that's bigger and heavier than the van. I changed the fluid and filter once in its life only because the $3.50 side cover rusted out and was leaking at around 85,000 miles. It has over 238,000 miles now.
If you're talking about a shift kit for the truck, I don't know what's available. The weak point seemed to be the overdrive unit years ago. It was an add-on that replaced the tail housing. Once redesigned parts were made available we stopped hearing about problems. I don't know much about the newer truck transmissions. There are some computer controls but I think they're still mostly hydraulically-controlled.
The slippage you're referring to is anticipated when they designed the transmission and is very minimal. The worst problems are from severe overheating when people rock the vehicle back and forth trying to get unstuck from snow. Besides that, it's usually the lip seals that get hard with age and crack. That leads to internal fluid leakage and insufficient pressure on the clutch plates. That's where the excessive slippage comes from. When you take one apart that has been slipping, the fiber clutch plates are worn down as you would expect, but the steel plates are scorched too and the lip seals crack and crumble when you try to remove them. That means the slippage and wear wasn't caused by normal shift cycles. It was caused by the hardened seals. A shift kit won't help that.
Most professionals aren't big fans of chemicals that are designed to fix things, but you might look at adding a can of seal conditioner to the transmission fluid. That is supposed to help keep the seals rubbery and pliable.
As for the exhaust, the engine has to do work to push the exhaust out and anything that makes that easier will result in better fuel mileage. There is a point of diminishing return though. If you look at the huge pipes on a Cummins diesel, that is what is needed to get the exhaust out efficiently at any speed. The same is true on gas engines. Some vehicles come with a 2 1/4" exhaust pipe. The same model with a smaller engine may come with a 2" system to save a little money. The manufacturers are extremely competitive and if going to an exhaust system that was a puny 1/4" larger in diameter would get one more horsepower or one more mile per gallon that they could advertise, you can be sure they would do it. Headers and dual exhaust are options for people who have done other things to increase horsepower. Then the exhaust system becomes the weak link in the chain, so to speak, and is the biggest restriction to air flow in and out of the engine.
The two biggest factors in fuel consumption is friction and wind resistance. It takes a certain number of BTUs to move the truck. To lessen friction you have to lighten the vehicle. The designers already spend a lot of time in the wind tunnel so there's not much you're going to improve upon there.
All '96 and newer models sold in the U.S. Have the "On-board Diagnostics version 2, (OBD2). That includes an oxygen sensor ahead of the catalytic converter to tell the computer how to fine tune the air / fuel mixture, and it has an oxygen sensor after the converter to tell the computer how efficiently the converter is working. V-6 and V-8 engines can have a converter on each side and four O2 sensors. Older versions had both sides feeding into a single converter, then just one O2 sensor in the pipe going out. The few custom dual exhaust setups I've seen split the exhaust pipe after that last oxygen sensor. That's done for looks and sound. It won't gain much in performance or fuel mileage. The converter becomes the tight spot for air flow, and it's really not very restrictive.
You can't tie two oxygen sensors together. The sensor generates a small voltage corresponding to the oxygen in the exhaust gas compared to the oxygen in the outside air. That voltage ranges from 0.2 to 0.8 volts. The goal is to tell the computer if the unburned fuel and air is too rich or too lean. Ideally, if the mixture is always perfect, you might expect to see a steady 0.5 volts but that will trigger a fault code because the system doesn't work that way. In a properly-running engine you will see that voltage bouncing from real low to real high a couple of times per second. When the exhaust goes lean, the unburned oxygen is stored in the catalyst until it is needed. When the system goes rich a fraction of a second later, the unburned fuel mixes with the stored oxygen and is burned. The converters today are so efficient that you can suck on the tail pipe with the engine running, and live to tell about it! WHEN that converter is working properly, the gas coming out of it will be a little lean for a relatively long time, as in a minute or more, then a little lean for a long time. While the "switching rate" for an upstream sensor is a couple of times per second, the switching rate for a downstream sensor might be a couple of times per minute.
When the converter loses its efficiency, no change takes place in the composition of the exhaust gas between the time it enters and leaves the converter. Since both O2 sensors are seeing the same thing, they switch between rich and lean at the same rate. That doesn't happen all of a sudden. Instead, as the converter's efficiency gradually decreases, the downstream sensor's switching rate gradually increases. There is a threshold programmed into the computer at which point it knows the converter isn't doing its thing, and it sets a fault code for "catalytic converter efficiency" and turns on the Check Engine light. You can actually watch that on a scanner. The front sensor will be bouncing back and forth and the rear one will be steady.
If you imagine the O2 sensors as tiny batteries, they each develop a small voltage. If you connect a good car battery in parallel with a dead one, current will flow between them until the voltage equalizes and remains steady. That's not the goal though with the sensors. They are supposed to be varying in voltage. I don't know if current can be pushed into the sensor with the lower voltage, as with the car batteries, or if the computer would just see the higher of the two voltages. At any rate, the voltage seen by the computer won't be switching between rich and lean at the proper rate. When one goes lean, the other one might be going rich, and vice versa, so the computer will set a code for "system running too rich too long" and it will try to correct that by reducing the amount of fuel it commands from the injectors. That applies to the front sensors.
For two rear sensors tied together, as you're proposing, I don't know what would happen if one was switching very slowly, like normal, and one was switching rapidly. There are a number of self-tests the Engine Computer is designed to perform at certain times. Usually you don't know when that's taking place, but the computer might command an unusually lean or rich mixture long enough for the results to show up at the second sensor, then it can watch how that sensor responds. It may do that to each side of the engine at different times to insure you don't feel it taking place on the highway. Chrysler calls that series of tests a "global good trip". If that passes at some point in the recent past, the computer is happy and the vehicle will pass emissions testing on some states.
Saturday, December 8th, 2012 AT 9:57 AM