I'm pretty confident the starter is not the issue. When one is rebuilt, it gets a series of tests, and no rebuilder would let one go making an abnormal noise. And your chance of getting two like that from two different cities is even more unlikely.
These rebuilt starters you're getting are Nissan starters that failed on someone else's car, got returned to a rebuilder, then sent out to the auto parts stores. Most new-car dealers buy their starters from the same rebuilder companies; you're just paying more for the same thing. You can request a brand new Nissan starter, but as I mentioned, it will cost a lot more. Depending on how long ago that starter was manufactured, it could have the same design shortcomings, or the same lowest-cost parts they could find that would do the job, as your original starter had.
Your car is 20 years old, and parts like starters are often the same for many years, so it is likely your starter part number was used for another ten or 15 years. In that time, when a manufacturer learns of a high-failure part, or some common repair history, in the name of quality, they will redesign some aspect of the part, or use a stronger part or one less prone to wear. That is a potential reason a new starter from the dealer could be better than your original one. On the flip side, when a manufacturer identifies a troublesome part and develops an improvement, that improvement will find its way to the rebuilder companies too, then that improved part will become part of their standard rebuilding process.
To say that a different way, a rebuilt starter or a new one from the dealer could both be better than what came off your car. My concern now is what is the dealer going to blame if the noise is still there?
To add another dimension to this sad story, back in the '70s, my friends and I loved the old Chrysler products. Chrysler was the world's leader in developing innovations that benefited car owners like us. One of them was their starter design that for many years could be modified for use on GM race engines because Chrysler's were the only ones strong enough to start those engines. Their popular design first showed up in 1960, then, by around 1968, they looked the same and interchanged the same through all the years, but the internal parts were completely different. Then they were resigned again a few times through the late '80s. Any starter from any year could be used on any year car, but if you wanted to repair one yourself, as we always did, you had to buy the correct set of parts for the individual starter. Each design change resulted in improved reliability, improved ease of service, more resistance to the effects of engine heat, or reduced weight. If you were to buy a brand new starter from the dealer's parts department, you could get one that was manufactured in 1989 to the latest and most-improved design, or you might get one that was built in 1972 and has been sitting on the shelf for many years, with an inch of dust on the box.
In the case of Chrysler, and most other manufacturers, when a part gets a major redesign, it gets a new part number. This is why when looking up parts on an auto parts store"s web site, or even in their parts books on the counter, they will list multiple part numbers this new one will replace and work in place of. When only a small change is made, such as switching to a stronger bolt, or adding some metal to a weak spot in the housing, they will only change the suffix of the part number. For example, radios I work on might have a part number of 5265418AA, and the next one will be 5265418AB. Those are the same radio and they fit the same applications, but by the time the one ending with "AB" came down the assembly line, a minor, but significant change was made to the design. In one example I'm aware of, one small component was changed to replace one that was susceptible to changes in temperature, and it resulted in the stations drifting a little over time. That one part was responsible for improved customer satisfaction, but it didn't warrant a whole new part number for that radio. Every letter higher in the suffix denotes a change was made compared to the ones with the previous letters.
Getting back to the reason I brought up the Chrysler starter story, those were real easy to replace when the car was up on a hoist, but it could be a miserable job when laying on the ground. There was a sheet metal plate on the front of the transmission with a hole in it for the starter to sit in. When struggling on the ground and removing the starter, it was real easy to let it hang by its own weight, and bend a small area around that hole. You couldn't see that damage by eye, but once reinstalled, the starter made that same screeching noise you're experiencing. Most of the time we were putting the original starter back in that we had just taken out, so you know the starter wasn't the cause of that noise. At times this became frustrating because we had to take the starter back out, try to find the bent spot in the sheet metal plate, bend it back straight, then stuff the starter back in. Once we went through all that work, about half of the time the noise was still there, and we had to start all over.
Today I'd like to think I'm smarter, but I still like to repair an old starter instead of buying a rebuilt one. Instead of crawling around on the ground, I pedal to my friend's shop and use his hoist.
Since I am rather confident the starter is not causing the noise, and since it is starting your engine just fine, I would request the next mechanic to repair, straighten, or replace the splash shield. On most cars, that shield is fairly easy to remove as a temporary test to prove that is what's causing the noise. Most of the time, with it on the workbench, you can see the shiny or ground-down area where the rubbing was occurring. If bending it back to proper shape is too difficult, the offending area can be ground or cut away without causing any other problems. The shield is there to keep fingers and rocks out. They shouldn't have to replace the starter again unless that would make you feel better.
Regardless of how this is handled, please keep us updated on your progress and on what the final solution involves.
Thursday, January 9th, 2020 AT 11:28 AM