To all of you following this thread.
I never used AllData. I did not believe the mechanic. I've seen errors in reproduction when people rush to publish. The error could have come from anywhere.
I think the subtlety of the difference between interpreting the literature and making an assumption need closer inspection. Volvo developed many B2.3 Liter engines and there were variances both for natural aspirated vs turbocharged and for Euro market vs. American. There were at least three B2.3L for the 940, alone. As is proven by the testimonial preceeding this reply, some of us know the subtleties.
A. This 2.3 L 940 is a single overhead camshaft vehicle with a non-interference valve design and a turbocharger. B. The precursor to the white engine is the B234T and is an interference valve design, and was not commonly sent to America. C. The B2.0L Turbo is an interference valve design turbo produced for and sent to Italy where you pay for power (povero Ferrari)
As an answer to my original question, I read your post saying that you have 'seen' bent valves sic: vent ** on a red block. So I had a what? 98% chance of being right? Or in this case, 100%. I'm just disappointed that my husband didn't give me credit in his comment, above. I give him credit for not believing AllData.
** the above Caribu testimonial typo 'vent' for bent is good proof that mistakes happen in publication.
Thanks,
Mia, 51-year-long Volvo owner. Fleet: daily drivers, 1989 240DL, 1986 245DL, 2001 C-70; in the works, 1997 Platinum T-5 sedan; 3-1995 Yellow T-5R sedans; Subject car, 1995 940 Turbo; RIP, 1989 245 DL, 1985 245 Turbo, 1981 260 GLE, 1984 240 GL, 1983 240DL, 1983 and 1981 240Turbos, 1976 245 DL Rust Bucket, 1964 P1800, 1966 1800S; Stolen, 1962 122S; over 1.5 million miles, and yes, I knew Irv Gordon, awesome guy
Monday, December 2nd, 2019 AT 6:22 PM