2000 Honda Civic New rotors or not?

2000 HONDA CIVIC
50,000 MILES • 4 CYL • FWD • AUTOMATIC
Avatar
MEGMO57
  • MEMBER
  • 1 POST
I am looking into buying this used Honda civic. I took it in to a mechanic for a diagnostic inspection, and they told me that the brake pads were at 50% but the rotors needed to be replaced (and would change the brake pads while they were at it). However, the car dealer also had it taken into a mechanic and he said that the brake pads were indeed at 50%, but the rotors are fine. Could in fact a discrepancy occur regarding the condition of the brake pads, or is the dealer just trying to get this car sold? Additionally, the manual says the timing belt needs to be changed at 100,000 miles (the car has 50,000) or at 7 years (it is 8 years old). Again, the dealer says not to worry about it because of the low mileage. Should I veer on the side of caution and have it changed to avoid engine trouble, or let it go until the mileage increases. Thank you so much!!!
Nov 2, 2008 at 4:07 AM
Advertisement
Avatar
MERLIN2021
  • Experienced Mechanic
  • 17,250 POSTS
Unless the rotors are warped, or too thin as measure with a micrometer, or rusted, pitted or heat spotted, then they should be OK until the pads need to be done. As for the belt, if the recommended interval is seven years, it wuld be safer to have it done now, if it breaks while your driving, it will ruin the engine!
Nov 2, 2008 at 4:13 AM
Join 2CarPros for free, one of the most advanced car repair communities on the internet. From first-time drivers to seasoned mechanics, everyone is welcome to reply, share details, and get better answers. You can add a temporary image or video first; uploads are limited to 20 MB.
Ask a Free Question
Repair Safety Notice: This information is for general instructional purposes only. Vehicle repair can be dangerous. Verify all information, follow manufacturer service procedures, use proper tools and safety equipment, and consult a qualified repair shop when needed.