Yes, I feel that way too, but that is not my intent. A lot of people read through these posts before posting their own question. I can't think of a logical way troubleshooting steps could lead to the starter for a problem in a totally unrelated circuit, and I want to avoid having people run out and buy a starter thinking it's going to solve a charging system problem. I would step in too if someone said they solved an overheating problem by replacing a brake light bulb.
I'm not denying your problem has been solved, but in my experience, when asked to interpret repair bills, I've found too often that mechanics present their own version of what "solved the problem". That is USUALLY not done to defraud. It is done to simplify the explanation so the average car owner will accept it, and the mechanic can get back to work on the next car. I would be much more willing to accept your explanation if you had done the diagnosis and repair yourself. Mechanics, just the people in many other professions, have very poor communication skills when working with car owners. A lot gets lost in translation.
I've had similar problems with my own vehicles. One in particular was what acted exactly like an engine with a carburetor running out of gas. I fought that intermittent problem for a year and a half, until it finally failed completely. Turned out be the ignition coil. I never once had loss of spark when the problem occurred, until that total failure. There is no way I can allow the next person to think they are going to solve the same problem on their vehicle with the same solution. In this case, no expert has ever guessed the cause when I presented the problem, and it wasn't until the cause was known that a believable explanation could be figured out.
Again, I would never expect this to apply to another vehicle, but thank you for including your information. I WAS wrong once before, ... In 1969. I thought I had made a mistake, but found out later I didn't, therefore, I was wrong.
Wednesday, March 29th, 2017 AT 1:42 PM