Maybe "batt" and "starter" are reversed?
I'm pretty sure you have the newer style solenoid
. But it most likely operates like the older type
we also have the "factory defective" or "you done ruined it" factor that may play in
the only thing that should activate it is "s", when "s" wire dies or is disconnected completely the solenoid should return to nothingness
unless it is sticking or wired wrong
i have a diagram of the older style "in action" on my '77 jeep cj 5
pay attention to a few things
a) the starter side only has one cable on it, it runs nothing else
b) on my jeep/ older fords, all accessories stack up on the battery side big terminal
c) "s" is/ uses "only" momentary 12 volts from a switch/ button
d) "i" supplies 12 volts to the coil during "crank up", then dies off (12 v) now listen! Listen! Attention! While it's running and hooked up still, if you test "i terminal" with a voltmeter, you will show "coil voltage" (lower than 12 v)
pay attention to "i" in my diagram
think of this too
what might happen on the newer style solenoid if "starter" and battery" were reversed on it?
Would the starter post (now used for the batt) constantly feed 12 volts to "s" thru the "i" circuit when "s" initialized the activation?
Sorta look at my diagram as if the roles of the terminals were reversed - follow the "red wires" to the "positive coil".
What if "i" was internally hooked to "the big starter lug" during crankage (then never turned loose 'cause it was then constantly fed voltage once the electromagnet bridges the open circuit. Hard to explain. Make any sense?
Keep us posted as you continue!
The medic
Images (Click to make bigger)
Thursday, November 27th, 2014 AT 9:32 AM