A couple of months ago I would have said the 118 foot pounds was wrong, but in fact, I did run across one model that was listed that low. That really surprised me. The better alternative is to go by what is specified on the instruction sheet that comes with the new bearing assembly. Typically they will call for the same as for the original dealership bearing, but sometimes an aftermarket supplier will have one already in production for other models that will work on a newer one that calls for a lower value. In that case you have to go by what the bearing needs, not what the manufacturer specified for that model year.
As for camber, that is one of the three main alignment angles and it has the biggest say for pulling to one side. Caster is the other, for mismatched cater has practically no effect on front-wheel-drive vehicles, so it's usually not even adjustable.
Beside pulling, camber must be in specs for best tire wear, and when set close to 0.00 degrees, (perfectly straight up and down), or slightly positive, (tipped out on top), it places the vehicle's weight directly over the wheel bearing. On older cars with tapered inner and outer bearings that we used to have to repack occasionally, camber placed the weight directly over the larger inner bearing. The smaller outer one was just meant to hold the wheel straight. It wasn't meant to support any weight.
If you're replacing multiple suspension and steering parts that require an alignment, but you're trying to avoid that alignment, a trick is to start out with a straight steering wheel when you're driving on a straight road, replace the parts, (think tie rod ends), on just one side, then test-drive the car and tweak the toe until you get back to a straight steering wheel. That will ensure you have toe close enough to make the car drivable to the alignment shop. Now replace the parts on the other side of the car, then do the same thing.
When doing this trick with ball joints, it depends on the type of joint. Chrysler uses mostly a ball and stud that sits in a centered hole in a socket that sits in a round hole in the lower control arm. You can't help but get that stud back in the same orientation the old one was in before it became sloppy, so, in theory, no alignment should be needed if that's the only part that was replaced. A lot of GM vehicles use a design that has a wing on the joint's housing, and three or four rivets were holding it to the control arm. With that style, there's no way to ensure they're the same as the old one, so the alignment has to be checked. Even if the car goes straight, GM cars can be rather forgiving for incorrect camber, but the clue will be the steering wheel is off-center. When camber changed, the steering arm on the spindle moves in or out a little. When the tie rod ends haven't been readjusted to accommodate that, it turns that wheel one way. You have to bring it back so both front wheels are off-center equally to make the car go straight. The result is that off-center steering wheel.
I forgot to mention that a lot of axle nuts are "torque-to-yield", meaning they're a one-time-use nut. The threads stretch when the nuts are tightened, so they're supposed to be replaced each time they're removed. When that style is used, a new nut usually comes with the new bearing or half shaft.
I didn't mean to take over your conversation. I'll let you guys continue and just jump in if you need me.
SPONSORED LINKS
Thursday, February 8th, 2024 AT 6:53 PM